Activitate

Foarte amanuntit rezumat! Grozav!Pun aici citatul lui Donnel Stern la care tu faci referire privind „topica” si o sa pornim de la el:”I am stretching a point to call the meaning of unconscious mutual enactment implicit.It is perhaps closer to my view to say thet such meanings are dynamically unconscious, by witch I mean two things:(1) they do not exist relative to verbal language, but, apart from it;(2) they are specifically (that is, defensively) excluded from awareness.Implicit meanings, in my frame of reference, are those that can be directly represented in language; dynamically unconscious ones, on the other hand, cannot be.Dynamically unconscious meanings are what Fourcher (1992) calls the „absolute unconscious”.BCPSG’s „implicit relational knowing” (IRK) is not dynamically unconscious, either in BCPSG’s view or in mine, because IRK is not specifically excluded from awareness, but because of its nature, IRK cannot necessarily be verbally represented either. It therefore lies, for me, on the border between the implicit and the absolute unconscious.”